Born in the urban estate of a Big
town, 17-year-old, Mr. Surya is just like the any other youth of India. His
parents brought him up very dedicatedly, patiently, and carefully. They
actually left no stone unturned while looking after his education, providing
health facilities, amusement options and a lot more. Being the only child to
his parents, who are again the single children to their respective parents, it
was Surya who has to look for the aging elders at his home, ultimately, which
includes- four of his grandparents and two- his own parents.
Apart from carrying attributes
like high intellectual capacity and decision-making skills, he was at the time
highly ignorant to his elders, adamant by nature and least adjustive to the
family. His parents were really concerned about his growing tough behaviour and
carrying rudeness towards his responsibilities. While recalling the day he was
born, his parents had found themselves fortunate enough to have the first child
as male and likewise never felt a need to go for the option of the second
child. Now, they are a solely dependent on their only child and quite nervous
about their future life. Such types of tales are not confined to Surya’s family
only but belong to many households across India.
Rapidly increasing population in
last century had occurred as a serious issue to the Government and for the
developing country like India- Higher Population appears as a burden on its
resources, be it- water, fresh air, land, food, minerals, housing, jobs and
more. Worldwide, in terms of population size wise, India is currently in the
second place, preceded by its neighbour country China. After the last census in
2011, the population of India was counted as 1.23 crore, which, before crossing
the next decade, has reached 1.33 crore.
Time to time, a number of steps/
initiatives have been taken up by the government, civil societies, NGOs etc. to
put a check on the rising population like- Formulation of National Population
Policy, Family planning practices, One-Child Policy, etc. Although these
initiatives have worked in the desirable direction and have taken us at a
certain point yet with many aftermaths. At present, the growth rate of
population in India is 1.1%. Of course, this is what we approached for, to
control the demographic dividend and to ensure better welfare services to all.
But are we sure of where we all are heading to?
In fact, One Child Policy in
India is dragging us towards a much darker period where the social consequences
will be more and more severe and their repercussions will reverberate for
generations to come. Perhaps, that’s what our neighbour country -China has
already experienced and genuinely, in 2015, they had announced a major shift
from their controversial one-child policy to two child policy. China had seen
the social set back from their previous notorious one-child policy which was
introduced nationally in 1979, with the idea to slow down the population growth
rate. The abolition of the policy was done in the backdrop of shrinking labour
workforce, rapidly aging population, unbalanced growth, disturbed social health
of the country and numerous other issues.
In India too, we have reached
1.1% population growth rate and this has again taken the debate of population
controlling measures at the forefront, especially, questioning the credibility
of one-child policy across the nation. With the narrowing down of the family
pyramid, India’s joint family structure has already been shaken up and we have
moved towards the nuclear family structure. This, no doubt has killed the
spirit of Big families and hence, family values which the children ought to
learn from their uncles/aunts-’chacha-Chachi’, ‘bua-fufa’, ‘mausa-mausi’,
grandparents, grandparents (maternal), cousins, relatives of the relatives and
so on.
The intervention of the state in
the family structure vis a vis reproductive rights of the people has hampered
the mindset of people. However, initially it was needed but putting on
regressive actions like- throwing people with extra children- out of job; not
allowing them to contest elections, not provide access to welfare schemes like
scholarship etc to the extra children have certainly tilted the psyche of
Indian couples and made them bias in reproductive decision making. Now the
Indian couples have made themselves satisfy with their only child, and two
children when the first child is a baby girl. This has triggered for the
unbalanced growth of society.
Government’s clampdown of births
will grapple India in future- with the shortage of staff for armed forces,
diminish the demographic dividend and decrease the stake of the Indian diaspora
in taking high-end jobs across the world. (One must know that India is the only
country in the world with a demographic dividend which means we are the only
country where the number of workable population (15-59 age) is more than the
dependent population (0-14, 59+ age)). Moreover, the choice and number of
childbearing differs class-wise, as observed that the economic well-off segment
is more prone towards producing fewer children as compared to those who are
economically poor. This has made the number of children inversely proportional
to the symbol of social status, in the majority of Indian minds.
One child policy has also acted
against women- whose consent and a stake in reproductive decisions is hardly
counted in orthodox societies, and the blame, as well as burden, comes as whole
to them. Even the patriarchal mindsets have resorted towards a higher rate of abortions,
female infanticide and even abandoning female infants. This has brought the
reproductive health of women the vulnerable and coercively hampering their
rights. Female-Infanticide- which apart from being a total unethical practice,
is acting negatively towards the sex ratio in India. Even the shared household
responsibility factor has hit the low along with rise in crime against women,
girls and brought the existence of fairer sex at questionable place.
Apart from providing a balanced
growth, and value-based family environment, having more than one child in a
family keep themselves emotional and social connected and be there for each
other in any sort of time. As seen in the above-stated case of Surya- the
single child can hardly become the citizens with cooperative mindsets. Since
they don’t learn to share toys, things, foods, living place and even feelings
to their age-mates in the beginning days to the psychological development of
their life, their later phases of life too bear the aftermaths of their
isolative upbringing. The duty to provide a sister or a brother to the child
lies with the parents, which will also help the child once the parents are not
there for him. The child will learn to give and take love, execute
responsibilities and understand the world around him more clearly.
Additionally, the duty of upbringing of the child will also get relieved when
another sibling is there to look after his/her brother/sister.
Ranging from Macro to Micro
level, economic to political level; the one-child policy appears as a policy
which is more of regressive nature than that of a progressive one. In the
context of social and cultural settings of India, One-child policy is strictly
not going to be ok. Our government and educated people must learn from the
example of China and must not overstrain the implementation of One child Policy
here. However, our policymakers must not resort to these coercive practices
rather they should resort to persuasion and education vis-a-vis ensuring the
improved quality life of the people here.
Ms. Minakshi Sehrawat
No comments:
Post a Comment